[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ASTRO] Re: MOAM on mtv (or anywhere else)
- To: joshua a manchester <manchest@students.uiuc.edu>, Michael Kepler <kepler@metro1.com>
- Subject: Re: [ASTRO] Re: MOAM on mtv (or anywhere else)
- From: "Michael Kepler" <kepler@neptune>
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 11:21:00 -0700
- Cc: Multiple recipients of <astro-list@furball.slime.org>
- In-Reply-To: joshua a manchester <manchest@students.uiuc.edu> "Re: [ASTRO] Re: MOAM on mtv (or anywhere else)" (Oct 8, 11:03am)
- References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.971008105617.1680B-100000@ux8.cso.uiuc.edu>
You've all read it, but it is included below for context.
All I can add to other replies is that this is just plain sad
and almost scary.
Mookie
On Oct 8, 11:03am, joshua a manchester wrote:
> Subject: Re: [ASTRO] Re: MOAM on mtv (or anywhere else)
> I also would just hate to see MOAM get popular. So many good bands have
> gotten wrecked that way. No one really can realistically say that they
> would love to see their band be huge and sell out and have every
> pubic-hairless screaming power-slut, jock dip shit, spent $80 on these
> alternative jeans closet preppy, useless bandwagon fans running around.
> MOAM is ours, not theirs, and you all know what it feels like to lose
> that feeling of ownership when a band that is 'your secret' is suddenly
> liked by a bunch of people that in your opinion have no business even
> knowing about their existence.
>
> jsoh